Roger Ver Vs Charlie Lee Debate About the Lightning Network (Amongst Other Things)
Bitcoin.com recently organized a long-awaited debate between controversial Bitcoin evangelist Roger Ver and the founder of Litecoin, Charlie Lee wherein the two giants discussed their thoughts and ideas regarding the “Lightning Network” amongst many other issues related to the world of crypto. The discussion also looked at the BCH vs LN debate with both Ver and Lee putting forth some interesting points from two different perspectives— with Lee playing the role of the seasoned crypto engineer and Ver acting as the impassioned crypto marketer.
Roger Ver Clearly Has Issues With the Lightning Network
From the very start of the conversation it becomes quite apparent that Ver is not impressed with the future potential of Bitcoin Lightning payments. Ver repeatedly interrupted Lee when he was talking on the aforementioned subject and asked him questions like, “How many shops are currently accepting Bitcoin Lightning Payments?” in an attempt to discredit Lee’s claims of the LN network being the future of digital transactions.
However, a simple search online shows that there are currently more than 12 merchants on BTCPay that are offering BTC Lightning Payments as we speak.
Other than that, Ver also made a bold assertion when he claimed that the Lightning Network “encourages censorship” by allowing nodes to “exclude” other member nodes by refusing to connect with them. This point was then swiftly debunked by Lee after he pointed to certain technicalities as to why what Ver was claiming was not actually possible.
“BTC is no longer a viable P2P electronic cash system”, Says Ver
Another point that Ver repeatedly tried to argue is how Bitcoin is not a viable digital currency since it cannot be used to buy, something like say a ‘cup of coffee’. In Bitcoin’s defense, Lee stated that via the use of the “Lightning Network” such transactions can not only be achieved but will most likely become the norm moving forward (primarily through the implementation of second-layer protocols).
Ver then went on to say that BTC’s transfer fees are quite hefty, to which Lee promptly replied “ You think 47 cents to facilitate an otherwise arduous transaction is too much?”
Final Take on the Debate
Whatever your personal opinions about Ver or Lee may be, this discussion had some good moments (regardless of whose side you’re on). If you really want to learn more about Roger and Charlie’s stance on the future of Bitcoin and the Lightning Network, it is best you watch the entire 12 minute clip on Youtube for yourself rather than read the opinions of biased internet trolls on twitter.
Bitcoin (BTCUSD) weekly forecast on February 18 — 24, 2019
Cryptocurrency Bitcoin (BTC/USD) is trading at 3587. Cryptocurrency quotes are trading below the moving average with a period of 55. This indicates a bearish trend for Bitcoin. At the moment, cryptocurrency quotes are moving near the upper border of the Bollinger Bands indicator.
Bitcoin (BTCUSD) weekly forecast on February 18 — 24, 2019
As part of the Bitcoin exchange rate forecast, the test level of 3820 is expected. Where should we expect an attempt to continue the fall of BTC/USD and the further development of the downward trend. The purpose of this movement is the area near the level of 2700. The conservative area for selling Bitcoin is located near the upper border of the Bollinger Bands indicator at the level of 3850.
Cancellation of the option to continue the decline in Bitcoin will be the breakdown of the area of the upper border of the Bollinger Bands indicator. As well as the moving average with a period of 55 and closing of quotations of the pair above the area of 4250. This will indicate a change in the current trend in favor of the bullish for BTC/USD. In the event of a breakdown of the lower border of the Bollinger Bands indicator bands, we should expect an acceleration of the fall of the cryptocurrency.
Bitcoin (BTCUSD) weekly forecast on February 18 — 24, 2019 implies a test level of 3820. Further, it is expected to continue falling to the area below the level of 2700. The conservative area for selling Bitcoin is located area of 3850. Canceling the option of falling cryptocurrency will break the level of 4250. In this case, we should expect continued growth.
BTCUSD Analysis: Bitcoin still trading in a bearish consolidation [Video]
Any upside moves are classified as corrective ahead of what could be the next downside extension and bearish continuation. It would take a break back above 4,380 at a minimum to take the immediate pressure off the downside. Next critical support comes in the form of the July and September 2017 lows, around 2,000 and 2,975 respectively.
In this analysis, we take a look at Bitcoin each day, highlighting all of the need to knows for anyone looking to extract up to date information about major levels and relevant trends, both short term and longer-term. The analysis is designed for the trader, investor and even those simply holding the crypto asset, looking for an idea of where they may want to consider making that next conversion.
The cryptocurrency update is new each day and is presented with an added layer of animation, in an effort to make the analysis as engaging as possible, while also communicating the message with respect to key trends and levels in an easy to understand, seamless manner with great value add to all.
Are Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) Net Positive Or Negative For Bitcoin And Crypto Assets?
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) have been analyzed by several banking institutions around the world, specifically by several central banks in different countries. However, they are different than virtual currencies such as Bitcoin (BTC). How would the issuance of CBDCs affect Bitcoin and the whole crypto market?
There are some important differences between Bitcoin and CBDCs. For example, Bitcoin is permissionless, decentralized and censorship-resistant while CBDCs are permission, centralized and censorable. Thus, they are almost contrary to Bitcoin. While the most popular cryptocurrency provides freedom to users, CBDCs allow governments to have larger control over their populations.
A few days ago, the popular investment bank JP Morgan unveiled a stablecoin called JPM Coin that would be used to make transfers between customers in just a few seconds. Although JP Morgan’s CEO Jamie Dimon has been against virtual currencies, it seems that the bank will be using blockchain technology to power their virtual currency.
There were several individuals in the market claiming that the new JP Morgan digital coin killed Bitcoin, or at least, it is going to kill the most popular cryptocurrency in the market. However, it is important to understand that these coins will never be similar and work in a completely different way. CBDCs and stablecoins issued by financial institutions such as JP Morgan work in a centralized and controlled way.
Indeed, these new digital assets do not seem to present a threat to cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. SWIFT could be affected by these new coins. SWIFT is the mainstream and most popular system to perform cross-border payments. This system has proven to be slow and costly for many financial institutions and banks all over the world. Indeed, Ripple’s services could also be affected by the growth of new CBDCs.
CBDCs legitimize that virtual currencies are the future of money. Because of this, it might be possible for Bitcoin to distance itself from drugs and criminals. At the same time, with CBDCs individuals will discover that there are several advantages of using digital assets.
Individuals will clearly have their funds frozen at any moment using CBDCs if the financial institution regulating the asset decides so. Moreover, their accounts can be suspended and users would not be able to use these funds anymore.
There are some crypto experts that believe that CBDCs could be very harmful to societies. For example, China is currently trying to control its population with new surveillance systems related to how individuals use their funds.
Crypto fiat (i.e. government controlled permissioned cryptocurrencies) will be the biggest battleground globally for human rights over the next decade. China is leading the way, many other countries, including some big western democracies, will follow. https://t.co/8BqfmBJ2mP
— Ari Paul (@AriDavidPaul) February 13, 2019
With CBDCs, people will realize that there is no more freedom and that the government is ultimately controlling everything. This is why Bitcoin could grow as a safe haven where users can feel free to use their funds as they want without being controlled by governments.
That does not mean that Bitcoin will be used to perform illegal things. It means that users will protect their privacy and what they do with their funds.