Connect with us

Ripple

Ripple’s CTO clarifies that Interledger Protocol [ILP] is not connected to the RippleNet yet

Published

on

David Schwartz, the Chief Technological Officer at Ripple, clarified that ILP is not linked to RippleNet and speculated as to when they will be connected.

A Twitter user, @ipinky77 tweeted:

“Do I need to worry? RippleNet is NOT ILP compatible yet? “

This was because of the recent post by Evan Schwartz, the creator of Interledger Protocol [ILP] which stated that Ripple’s Network of banks was currently not connected to or accessible from the open Interledger and that Ripple’s products use a number of other proprietary protocols on top of an ILP-inspired foundation.

He further noted:

“It is possible that both of these could change in the future if there’s a demand from banks to connect to the open interledger, but that’s a decent ways off.”

Interledger protocol [ILP] was developed by two people, Stefan Thomas & Evan Schwartz to facilitate the transactions between two different ledgers with different currencies to go through with ease and less friction than the current fiat system. Through ILP it is possible to enable payments between any ledgers, creating a global graph of liquidity or Interledger.

The user Michael iPinky7 [@ipink77] further referenced a “Ripple Insight” article which stated that Ripple’s solution for banks, xCurrent was built around an open, neutral protocol, the Interledger Protocol [ILP], which would provide interoperability between different ledgers.

Michael iPinky7 stated:

“here it is quite clear: RippleNet IS based on ILP: https://ripple.com/files/ripple_product_overview.pdf … now as I have found other “misleading” info in Ripple’s public docu I am still unsure which is correct now.”

David Schwartz, the CTO of Ripple commented that ILP wasn’t stable enough to build production code on when RippleNet protocols needed to be locked down.

He continued:

“So RN use an older version that was ready then. Convergence will be doable when use cases emerge. My gut says that’s at least a year away, but who knows?”

A Twitter user, @placedonhodl commented:

“I believe what he is saying is exactly what we already knew. Banks are not using ILP as they are not using xRapid. They are using xCurrent which uses Interledger-inspired DLT.”

The post Ripple’s CTO clarifies that Interledger Protocol [ILP] is not connected to the RippleNet yet appeared first on AMBCrypto.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Ripple

XRP Price Stable Against Coinmotion Criticism

Published

on

On Feb 15, the XRP is moving up slightly, trading at $0.3089.

Over a few weeks, the crypto has been forming a triangle, still without testing either the resistance or the support. The MACD is however moving up, which makes the resistance breakout at 0.3047 more likely; this may then push the price to 0.3230. The overall trend is descending, though, so once the resistance at 0.3047 gets broken out, the price may also be sent to the support at 0.2899 and then break it out, heading towards the midterm support at 0.2804, and the target at $0.2470.

xrp price analysis

Coinmotion, a crypto exchange based on Finland, added the XRP to its portfolio. At the same time, the exchange published an article called XRP Is a Centralized Digital Currency, saying that the altcoin is not really a crypto.

The article author, Pessi Peura, says the investing process shows that Ripple is more like a security than a crypto. Besides, the token is developed by a single company, which is risky: in case Ripple Labs loses its reputation in any way, the XRP will have big problems.

Finally, Peura says Ripple Labs is controlling its tokens, which is totally against the decentralized network principles. This is actually the most curious thing, as Ripple Labs says its token is autonomous, and no monopoly is possible.

Ripple has not commented on the article yet, but is likely to comment soon, as the company is usually quick at reacting at any criticism in the media. Most likely, Ripple Labs will say the usual thing regarding XRP having nothing to do with securities.

Disclaimer

Any predictions contained herein are based on the authors’ particular opinion. This analysis shall not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex shall not be held liable for the results of the trades arising from relying upon trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.

Source:nulltx

Continue Reading

Ripple

Bank-based Cryptocurrencies Not Realistic: Ripple CEO

Published

on

ipple Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Brad Garlinghouse recently said that bank-based cryptocurrencies are not realistic and he believes they are “deeply misguided” for the entire industry.

These remarks come in the wake of the news reports that announced that the international bank, JP Morgan was all set to announce its own coin, JPM token. As earlier reported by Crypto-News India, the trials for the cryptocurrency, named as “JPM Coin” will begin in a few months and is designed for instant settlement of payments between clients. With the launch of its new cryptocurrency, the bank is preparing for the future to settle the transactions at lightning speed similar to that of Bitcoin rather than relying on old technology like wire transfers.

At the time, Umar Farooq, J.P. Morgan’s Head of Blockchain projects had said, “So anything that currently exists in the world, as that moves onto the blockchain, this would be the payment leg for that transaction. The applications are frankly quite endless; anything, where you have a distributed ledger which involves corporations or institutions, can use this.”

This is not the first time Garlinghouse expressed doubts about bank-based cryptocurrencies. In 2016, he had reportedly said, “A bank-issued digital asset can only really efficiently settle between the banks who issued it. Then, two scenarios can play out.”

Detailing those scenarios, the Ripple CEO had stated, “Scenario one: all banks around the world put aside competitive and geopolitical differences, adopt the same digital asset, agree on its rules, and harmoniously govern its usage. Fat chance. Scenario two (the more likely scenario): banks not in the issuing group issue their own digital assets with their own sets of rules and governance.”

Throwing in a good word about XRP, the CEO said, “We strongly believe banks need an independent digital asset to enable truly efficient settlement and we believe XRP is best positioned for that role.”

It remains to be seen, how exactly XRP intends to do what it had set out to do.

Liked what you read? Join us on Telegram

Source.crypto-news.in

Continue Reading

Ripple

Ripple new version of XRP Ledger 1.2.0 launched

Published

on

  • XRP Ledger requested to update the code before February 27.
  • XRP Ledger 1.2.0 is more resistance to censorship.

The San-Francisco-based blockchain company Ripple is reported to have released a new version of its renowned XRP ledger 1.2.0. The new version is designed to improve user experience as well expand the range of services it is offering.

The users of the ledger are requested to update to the latest version before February 27, 2019. The upgrade is vital because without it, the server won’t be able to determine the authenticity of the ledger and in return transactions will not be processed neither will they be submitted.

What has changed?

The new version according to the team at Ripple, is more resistance to censorship. This means that the transaction being processed cannot be determined by any single entity. Moreover, the transaction will remain immutable after entering the ledger. While the previous version was resistance to censorship, the team claims that this version greatly improves the feature. Warnings will be issued if there are attempts to interrupt the working of the ledger.

Furthermore, the upgrade has integrated what is commonly referred to as MultiSignReserve amendment. Ripple has now made it easier who take part in signing transactions while reserving only 5 XRP. Other updates included bug fixing and removal of errors on two transactions.

The company has also launched a bounty program. Developers have been requested to review all the updates in the new version and communicate to the company in the event any vulnerabilities are detected.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Open

Close