- Bitcoin corrected above $3,900 but failed to sustain growth towards $4,000.
- Bitcoin must sustain growth above $3,900 to give the traders confidence that $4,000 is achievable.
The crypto market has remained unchanged in spite of the news that CBOE is putting Bitcoin futures on hold. Bitcoin has been lethargic below $3,900 since the beginning of this week. Over the last weekend, the asset corrected above $3,900 but failed to sustain growth towards $4,000.
The trading yesterday saw the bulls fall into a bear trap: BTC/USD spiked briefly almost touching $3,900 but quickly turned around canceling the gains. The largest crypto tested the short-term support $3,700 before correcting higher above $3,850.
At press time, Bitcoin is exchanging hands at $3,851 within the 50 SMA resistance and the 100 SMA support 4-hour chart. As discussed before, Bitcoin must sustain growth above $4,000 to give the traders confidence that $4,000 is achievable. However, the traders are likely to get exhausted holding the position above $3,800 and are likely to sell. This is likely to create more supply and less demand. Bitcoin price will react by exploring the levels close to $3,500; a move that will create more demand and reverse the trend upwards.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin is supported by the bullish trendline; other support levels are $3,800 and $3,700. The RSI is horizontal at 51 while the MACD is flat out on at the mean line (0.0). Bitcoin sideways trading is likely to last longer as market activity reduces.
BTC/USD 4-hour chart
Bitcoin’s 2017 hardfork-triggered ‘BCH treasure-hunt’ still dividing mining pools
On 1 August 2017, Bitcoin Cash had forked away from Bitcoin after weeks of speculation and on 24 August, Bitcoin activated its SegWit upgrade.
Considered to be an important update, SegWit added a different P2SH address: nested Segwit which started ‘3’. The only difference between a normal P2SH address and a SegWit one is their spending scripts. The launch of SegWit is one of the main reasons for the lost 19,000 BCH to SegWit addresses.
Coinmetrics’ Recent State of the Network discussed the BCH tokens that have been mistakenly lost since 2017 and remain inaccessible because BCH did not have SegWit.
With time, it was figured out that miners would be able to access the lost BCH if they are able to break the standardness rules. The report said,
“Transactions spending from a nested SegWit address on Bitcoin Cash break one of these standardness rules (the clean stack rule, to be precise) and therefore will not be relayed; they can only be mined if included directly by a miner. So miners, or a user in direct contact with a miner, can spend from nested SegWit addresses on Bitcoin Cash, while normal users cannot.”
After such an opportunity was deciphered by a Russian Bitcointalk user, it was understood that only slightly more than 400 BCH sent to SegWit addresses on BCH could be claimed by miners.
It was clear as day that a capable miner was crucial to breaking the standardness rule. On 14 November 2017, the news that over 470 BCH worth $644k was available on a SegWit address went public. It did not take much time thereafter as two days later, BTC.com recovered the first batch of 100.7 BCH that were mistakenly sent to the nested SegWit addresses.
After the first recovery, BTC.com sent up its recovery service which started at a period of recovering BCH, at press time. BTC.com charged a recovery finder’s fee of 10 percent that was sent to the same address and it was identified that the revenue pool had 368.03 BCH.
Over time, other mining pools have joined in the quest for the lost BCH, something that was observed in the table shared above. The major problem with such a scenario is that the situation could have been easily avoided if necessary precautions were taken before the hard fork on 1 August 2017. Bitcoin’s quick update to SegWit right after the hardfork should have been activated after users were clear on Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash’s network situation.
Data from the report suggested that at press time, over 8,979 BCH has been recovered, but the extra finder’s fee allocated to these pools could have been avoided in the first place. Since last year, mining pools such as BTC.com and BTC.top are at 5,779 BCH and 3,846 BCH, respectively. With more than 9000 BCH still out there in nested SegWit addresses, the eventful hardfork from 2017 continues to stir a tussle between these pools over a lost jackpot.
Bitcoin briefly slips under $9k; triggers liquidations worth $11M
Bitcoin has been taking continuous hits in the spot market and at press time, the coin was noting a fall of 3.37% – a fall that pushed the price of the coin under $9k. According to the Chaikin Money Flow [CMF] indicator, the digital asset surged to occupy the overbought zone after Bitcoin’s price recorded a sudden plunge on 26 February.
Source: BTC/USD on Trading View
According to the chart provided by data analytics firm Skew, almost $11 million longs were liquidated. $9,300 was looked upon as strong support since 5 Feb, however, as the coin went under this mark sell-order might have been triggered.
FBI REPORT: BITCOIN RANSOM PAYMENTS TOTAL $144M
- Most Ransomware Required Payment in Bitcoin
- Ransomware Demands Grew in 2019
Ransomware attacks and similar extortion schemes took in an estimated $144 million in the course of 7 years. FBI estimates show most of the ransoms were paid in Bitcoin (BTC) and went straight to mixers or exchanges.
MOST RANSOMWARE REQUIRED PAYMENT IN BITCOIN
Attacks that lock files and require a ransom to decrypt them have lined up among the biggest cyber threats in the past few years. Ransomware has locked down airports and hospitals, entering older, vulnerable machines. Most ransomware versions share a message requiring a bitcoin payment to unlock all files. Despite advice not to pay, it turns out multiple targets actually sent in BTC to the ransomware extortionists.
FBI supervisory special agent, Joel DeCapua, shared the US agency’s discoveries during the RSA Conference 2020. He explained that any BTC or other coins acquired went immediately to coin mixers, or were sold on exchanges. But there is also a curious reason why so much was paid in ransoms – the companies affected may make an insurance claim.
No one wants to pay the ransom actors. I think a lot of companies get insurance now. They say, ‘Well, if we are hit by ransomware, we are just going to defer to what our insurance company wants to do… They can say it wasn’t their choice to pay the ransom, because like I said, no one wants to pay the ransom. So I think that because ransom payments are insurable, I think it has caused more ransoms to be paid.
Ransomware attacks have been linked to both Russian and North Korean hackers. The attack message usually contains a bitcoin address and instructions on how to acquire and send coins. However, paying the ransom on some occasions has left the files locked, hence the advice to avoid paying.
RANSOMWARE DEMANDS GREW IN 2019
Even now, a variation of bitcoin extortion is still making the rounds, marking a payment into one of the known wallets of a sextortion scheme.
The $144 million paid in ransoms is rather small and spread out in comparison to exchange hacks, and general crypto scams. Those accounted for billions in the past few years. Ransoms in BTC, however, spread a negative message about crypto coins as a tool for illegal activities.14 BTC & 30,000 Free Spins for every player, only in mBitcasino’s Crypto Love Affair! Play Now!
Ransomware demands grew significantly during 2019, based on data from a periodic Kaspersky cybersecurity report. Ransomware spreads on darknet sites, offering new variations of locking programs and even affiliate programs for spreading the files.