Connect with us

Cryptocurrency

G20 Summit in June may introduce a registry for the world’s cryptocurrency exchanges

Published

on

Major economies of the world are looking forward to meeting in Japan next month and finding a middle ground on the long-running issue of cryptocurrency and crypto-exchanges.

The world of cryptocurrency has often been a target for hackers, scammers, money launderers and Ponzi schemes, which is why many governments are prepared to take regulatory steps towards curbing this ‘menace’. This year alone,  hackers have stolen more than $1 billion, hitting major exchanges such as Cryptopia, Bithumb, and even Binance.

According to a report by Nikkei Asia, a registry of crypto-exchanges will be prepared on the sidelines of the G20 meeting in Japan next month. Safeguarding consumer interests will also be a crucial part of the upcoming G20 summit in Fukuoka, Japan. Doing so is a step towards investigating the operations of exchanges around the world.

Japan, the land of the rising sun, had taken the initiative in this matter, making it mandatory for all crypto-exchanges to be registered in 2017. Japan’s Financial Services Agency had also started carrying out authentication procedures like verification of IDs to prevent transactions from unidentified users, in the wake of resurrecting money laundering laws at the domestic level.

Financial Stability Board, an international financial regulating body, will be presenting the directory in front of G20 members. The Board wants all countries to come forward and work in the interest of their citizens. As the G20 summit nears, Japan’s Financial Services Agency is under pressure from the Financial Action Task Force [FATF] to form stricter rules for controlling crypto-assets.

The Board had previously issued a local directory of crypto regulators in April, 2019. The Board’s policymakers had issued an official statement saying,“They should be licensed or registered and subject to monitoring to ensure compliance.”

Such a step may be crucial towards curbing several crimes associated with cryptocurrencies. G20 Summit leaders may just decide the future of cryptocurrency by formulating a uniform, international regulatory framework on crypto-assets and exchanges. However, how the crypto-verse, a community which prides itself in its independence from government oversight, receives such steps is still up for debate.

Source/ambcrypto

Cryptocurrency

VanEck exec claims Visa, Mastercard were forced to stay away from Libra

Published

on

While several dissed Facebook’s cryptocurrency venture, Libra, a few others envisioned the social media giant’s move to be a boost to the crypto-industry, due to its global reach. However, the regulatory climate that surrounds the project has been hindering its launch. Recently, the five companies that backed Libra, namely, Visa, Mastercard, eBay, Stripe and Mercado Pago, followed the footsteps of PayPal and announced that they would no longer be part of this project.

Director, Digital Assets Startegy at VanEck , Gabor Gurbacs, is the latest to comment on the issue, claiming that these companies are being urged to leave the crypto-project. He took to Twitter and said,

“Every company that is leaving #Libra is likely, in some ways, forced to do that. It’s unfortunate and I am sorry that capital markets aren’t free.
Now you have a first-hand understanding why censorship-resistance is important!
> Welcome to #Bitcoin!”

Recently, these companies received letters from a few US senators, urging them to withdraw from the project. The letter stated that if the companies didn’t steer away from the project, they would have to encounter regulatory obligations. Gurbacs addressed the same in his tweet and said that regulatory burdens have hindered these companies from experimenting and innovating. He concluded his tweet by saying,

“America can do better!”

Recently, the New York-based investment giant, VanEck, withdrew its Bitcoin Exchange Traded Fund [ETF] application, a month before the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] was scheduled to give its final verdict about the approval or rejection of the application.

Additionally, the SEC also rejected Bitwise’s application that seeked the approval of a Bitcoin ETF. The asset management platform had submitted the application back in January. However, the SEC after delaying a verdict several times over the year, has finally dismissed it.

Source:ambcrypto

Continue Reading

Cryptocurrency

Cryptocurrency market update: Subdued trading action continues on Sunday, XRP/USD gains traction

Published

on

  • Bitcoin struggles to determine its next short-term direction.
  • Ethereum rebounds after posting modest losses on Saturday.
  • Ripple remains on track to register weekly gains for the second straight week. 

Major cryptocurrencies stay relatively calm for the second straight day on Sunday and continue to fluctuate between technical ranges in the absence of significant fundamental drivers that could impact the cryptocurrency market sentiment.

Top-3 coins price overview

Bitcoin (BTC/USD) posted small gains on Saturday and closed the $8,300 and is now moving up and down in a tight channel near that level. As of writing, the pair was up 0.5% on a daily basis at $8,345. Unless the pair advances beyond the critical 200-day moving average (MA), which is currently located at $8,700, and registers a daily close there, it is likely to have a difficult time finding its next direction.

Above the 200-day MA, $8,970/$9,000 (Fibonacci %78.6 retracement of June rally/psychological level) could be seen as the next resistance ahead of $10,000 (psychological level/Fibonacci %61.8 retracement of June rally). On the downside, the first technical support is located at $8,270 (20-day MA) before $7,700/$7,800 area (September 26th, September 30th, October 6th, October 7th low).

Ethereum (ETH/USD) lost 0.5% on a daily basis on Saturday and closed at $180. However, this move didn’t have enough momentum to suggest that sellers were looking to take control of the ETH/USD pair’s movements. In fact, the pair easily recovered Saturday’s losses on Sunday and was last seen trading near $182, adding 1.1% on the day. Looking at the near-term technical levels, $185 (50-day MA) aligns as the first hurdle on the upside before $200 (psychological level/October 11th high). Supports, on the other hand, could be seen at $177 (20-day MA), $170 (October 6th, October 7th low) and $152 (September 26th low).

After gaining nearly 2% on Saturday, Ripple (XRP/USD) is outperforming other major cryptocurrencies on Sunday as well. As of writing, the XRP/USD pair was up 1.95% on the day at $0.2783. With this weekend’s rally, the pair remains on track to gain more than 8% on a weekly basis after rising 6.3% in the previous week. 

Looking at the daily chart, the Relative Strength Index indicator continues to stretch higher above the 50 mark, suggesting that bullish momentum is gathering strength. The pair could face the first resistance at $0.29 (October 9th high) ahead of $0.3 (psychological level) and $0.3270 (September 18th low). On the downside, supports are located at $0.2635 (50-day MA), $0.2125 (September 24th low) ve $0.20 (psychological level).

Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility.

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin

Source:coideK

Continue Reading

Cryptocurrencies

SEC Looks to Suspend “Unlawfully Sold” Telegram (GRAM) Cryptocurrency

Published

on

The upcoming launch of GRAM tokens has become somewhat of a spectacle for the cryptocurrency community in recent months. With final token disbursement on the horizon, the SEC has filed for emergency action against Telegram and Telegram Open Network (TON), both of whom are offshore entities to the United States. Out of the entire ordeal, the SEC’s classification of GRAM as a security is the biggest risk to the smooth launch and execution of the network, October 11, 2019.

Telegram Crackdown as Expected

Choosing to launch their network and native token without regulatory consultation was seen as a bold move from Telegram; however this appears to have backfired as the SEC has finally decided to “halt” their token offering. Nearly $1.7 billion has been raised by TON to launch a blockchain-enabled payment network that can be used over their messaging app and the scope of potential mainstream adoption is arguably on par with that of Facebook’s Libra, should that ever see the light of day.

The biggest concern for the SEC, at this point, is that GRAM tokens will be sent to respective investors before October 31, 2019. In light of this, the regulator believes this opens up the possibility of the United States market becoming a dumping ground for the tokens.

What irks the regulator the most is when companies issue tokens and don’t register them with the SEC. As the SEC describes, they allegedly evaded registration of their “security” by simply designating it as a ‘cryptocurrency’.

Veering Treatment From the Regulator

In one instance, the regulator could decide to impose a fine on a $4 billion initial coin offering (ICO) that is less than a basic business purchase and allows the project to continue working; or, they decide to completely stop the project from running in the country because they didn’t bow down to U.S. authority, which may open doors for Libra.

By the SEC’s definition, both EOS and Telegram conducted “unlawful digital token sales”. Whether EOS and GRAM are securities or not is up for debate, but that one small difference can’t possibly account for such a large deviation in their treatment.

In the age of decentralized money networks that are self-regulating, the SEC is fighting a very obvious power struggle, and they will do anything to ensure they do not lose their authority over this segment.

News Source

Continue Reading