The ‘Internet and Mobile Association of India vs RBI’ case hearing resumed on August 14 where the Supreme Court faced some strong arguments from the IAMAI counsel, Ashim Sood over Reserve Bank of India [RBI] overstepping its jurisdiction, as reported by Crypto Kanoon.
In the previous hearing on August 8, the Council had argued that the ban proposed by the central bank was in opposition to Constitution’s Article 19  g- All citizens shall have the right to practice any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
However, the Supreme Court explained to the council that the users could switch to banks who do not fall under RBI’s jurisdiction that is the foreign banks and exchanges. Since there are alternatives available to people and the businesses, Article 19  g cannot be levied in this matter.
Sood continued to argue the legality of the RBI ban and that it did not have the authority to place a ban when there was a lack of legislative policy for crypto. Counsel submitted various judgments in support of this argument and summarised that “RBI cant step out of its powers as set out in Banking regulation Act. Therefore its action against private businesses in the form of 6th April circular is illegal,” noted Crypto Kanoon live-tweeting the hearing.
Along with the previous judgments, it was also pointed out that “the RBI in its reply had admitted that it did not have the jurisdiction to speak on the legality of cryptocurrencies due to the lack of clarity on its status on being a coin or a currency”, however, used its ancillary power to impose a ban. They added that RBI acted under the “error of law” and that the law states that something which is not prohibited is legally permitted.
The power to ban or regulate something lies in the hands of the legislature and is a legislative act; thus the decision to ban or regulate crypto is in the hands of the legislature alone and not RBI. Sood, while presenting UK’s financial conduct authority’s report on crypto-assets noted a stark difference as it recognized 3 kinds of crypto assets, whereas the RBI in its reply stated that there was no need to define virtual currencies.
The case took an interesting turn when the counsel explained cryptos and DLT to the court, where the Counsel noted that
“Crypto is an electronic token to incentivise people who serve the DLT system to maintain its integrity.”
The discussion extended where the court was presented with data of various nations wanting to regulate cryptocurrency, rather than putting a ban. The cases of EU, China, France, and Japan had been discussed with a special focus on Japan, which regulates the exchanges under the Payment Services Act and had implemented KYC and AML laws. The court heard about the actions of regulations taken up by the G20 nations like Singapore, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Malaysia, UK, South Africa, and the USA.
The judge showed a keen interest in the type of Virtual Currencies as provided under the NY law, which was taken as a positive sign by the community. In closing, the counsel added that even though there is no denying about the detrimental effects of crypto like every other technology, these implications need to be regulated like other countries and not banned.Kashif Raza, co-founder of Crypto Kanoon and a prominent crypto expert stated:These arguments that are happening in the court should not be seen with the perspective of whether a negative thing is happening or a positive thing is happening. Everything that is happening in the court right now is good for the industry because today you’re getting a platform where you are able to communicate and convince as the world is watching.
Stablecoins TUSD, USDT, and GUSD have had an ironically unstable year
For most people, buying cryptocurrencies is just a click away; there are multiple options, credit cards, debit cards, and CashApp. However, even with a number of on-ramp options, the go-to option most people choose is buying a stablecoin.
Why? Simply due to the fact that they are stable and are backed by assets with mild or no volatility, hence providing a relatively safe store of wealth, at least in the short-term.
As another year after the year of the stablecoins (2018) comes to an end, it is time to reflect on how stable these stablecoins are.
Most of the time, Tether is the first thing that pops up in one’s head when the word ‘stablecoin’ is uttered; and rightfully so, due to the absolutely huge share of the stablecoin market it holds.
However, does it also mean that Tether is the most stable stablecoin?
Perhaps, or perhaps not. This article will take a deep-dive into the fundamental aspects of what makes a stablecoin stable, while also analyzing the performance of the top 5 stablecoins this year, to gauge how far they’ve come.
Stablecoin – What is it?
A stablecoin is a type of cryptocurrency whose value is collateralized to the value of an underlying asset, which could be asset-backed and be on or off the chain. Or it could be Seinorage-styled aka algorithmic, where it makes use of complex algorithms and smart contracts to maintain the price equilibrium.
The best known stablecoins include Tether [USDT], Gemini Coin [GUSD], Paxos [PAX], TrueUSD [TUSD], and DAI. Most of the well-known stablecoins are fiat-backed like Tether, Gemini Coin, Circle’s USD Coin, and True USD.
The reason behind the idea of stablecoins was to ultimately reduce the volatility that is inherent with/to cryptocurrencies and help cash-in or out of these assets. More importantly, during the inception of stablecoins, on-ramps to cryptocurrencies were non-existent, with the exception of legacy payment methods. The introduction of stablecoins alleviated this problem and helped catalyze cryptocurrency adoption.
A testament to Stablecoins’ Stability
Theoretically, stablecoins need to maintain their peg with the collateralized asset but practically, they don’t. Hence, a stablecoin with the least deviation from its peg should empirically prove to be the most stable of the lot. Other aspects that add to making a stablecoin ideal would be its liquidity and trading volume.
Attached below is a graph that exhibits the variation of stablecoins’ prices over the course of 2019. It is apparent that the highest skew from the peg was observed in TrueUSD. Following it were GUSD, PAX, and USDT.
Although almost all of the stablecoins had a huge deviation from the peg in the first half of 2019, it was reduced by a huge factor in the second half with the exception of GUSD. TUSD recorded the highest positive surge on 28 April, where 1TUSD was worth $1.04165. With 1 GUSD reaching about $0.98306, it was the only stablecoin whose peg collapsed the highest against the collateral.
Following GUSD was Tether, which fell to as low as $0.99073. Other stablecoins stayed very close to their original peg. Among these stablecoins, the highest standard deviation was ranked as TUSD, GUSD, PAX, and USDT.
An annual mean change of $1.00772391 was observed with TUSD, making it the most volatile stablecoin. With a $1.00553281 annual mean change, USDT was the second most volatile stablecoin, followed by PAX, USDC, and GUSD.
Although stablecoins are pegged to a stable asset like the U.S dollar, it is not 100% stable, the price deviates from its peg. An important thing to understand here is that this deviation/variation from the peg is based on three factors,
- Market Demand: If the demand is more, the price of a stablecoin tends to rise higher than the peg and will be traded on a premium
- Affiliated Entity: Since Bitfinex and Tether are swallowed up in rumors/allegations or lawsuits, the news tends to vary the price of the underlying asset related to the entity
- Exchange Dependent: This is an extension of the first point. If the demand for a particular asset is high on a particular exchange, the price will vary, creating an opportunity for arbitrage. However, this is temporary and the market will balance itself out
Speaking to AMBCrypto, Adam Back, Co-founder and CEO of Blockstream, stated,
“Sometimes time preference pulls tether over par unrelated to risk perception… Tether wire in/out fees plays a part also. It can maintain a disparity based on risk perception or demand for longer if the difference is less than the fee structure to arbitrage it out”
Market Cap & Trading Volume
Tether is undoubtedly the highest in terms of market cap and trading volume. Prolifically growing to about 4.1 billion USDT in circulation, Tether has a monopoly over the stablecoin market. Tether’s market share among the top 5 stablecoins in terms of trading volume is in excess of 83%, while the other 4 stablecoins cumulatively contributed the other 17%.
In terms of trading volume, Tether has a higher 24-hour trading volume than the crypto that started it all, Bitcoin. As of 4 December, Tether’s trading volume was $3.4 billion more than BTC’s.
The obvious distinction of Tether’s gargantuan share in comparison to other stablecoins is visible in the graph above.
Speaking about Tether’s market share, Back added,
“To say tether has the highest volume is an understatement, it has 97% and the rest of the competitors vie within the remaining 3%!”
Annual mean price change, ranking highest to lowest: TUSD, USDT, PAX, USDC, GUSD
Highest positive change in the peg, ranking highest to lowest: TUSD, GUSD, PAX. USDT, USDC
Highest negative change in the peg, ranking highest to lowest: GUSD, USDT, TUSD, PAX, USDC
TUSD, USDT, and GUSD have been the most unstable stablecoins in terms of change in peg and deviation. USDC and PAX, although contributing to only $670,70 million of the total market share, aren’t widely used.
In Tether’s case, its massive adoption could also play a vital role in steep deviation from its natural peg. Apart from being used for crypto-related transactions, Tether is also used for international payments and for quicker settlements.
So, why does Tether have so much sway over the markets even though it is technically not as stable as USDC or PAX? Probably because Tether was the first stablecoin to make it work and help early enthusiasts adopt Bitcoin on a large scale. Although there have been stablecoins that far surpass aspects like regulation and transparency in comparison to Tether, the majority of the crowd sticks with Tether. It could be due to this particular reason that USDT has been the go-to stablecoin and this justifies the convenience over some of the critical factors it so desperately lacks.
There have been quite a few stablecoins launched in 2019, some of these by exchanges like Binance. The GBP-backed stablecoin, BUSD, was announced by Binance in June and launched in September 2019. The famous, crypto-collateralized DAI, is worth mentioning in this list too and has been active since late 2017. Moreover, Multi-collateral Dai, a feature that was under development for more than 5 years, was launched in October 2019, allowing users to use other cryptocurrencies as collateral. Some of these tokens include Augur’s REP token, Brave’s BAT token, etc.
Bitfinex, the company closely related to Tether, is reportedly looking to launch a stablecoin backed by gold. The details about this project are yet to be disclosed.
Additionally, in what was one of the year’s major hypes, Calibra’s David Marcus revealed that Facebook’s Libra might also take a creative turn by launching a slew of stablecoins backed by the US Dollar, Euro, Sterling Pound, etc.
Taking Advantage of the Short-Comings – Arbitrage Trading
Since there is inherent volatility to stablecoins, it can be used to one’s advantage via arbitrage trading. Arbitrage trading is a forgotten discipline of trading in the crypto-industry, mainly due to slow transaction settling times. Factoring the slow settlement times, arbitrage trading would make it more tedious due to the requirement of huge amounts of capital. However, the introduction of Liquid Network with stablecoin integration might just resuscitate arbitrage trading.
With Liquid, it is possible for arbitrage trading between exchanges using BTC and USDT. Additionally, Back mentioned,
“Less capital is needed to close arbitrage spreads between exchanges if the arbs can be done in a few minutes cycle, manually or with arbitrage bots. At Blockstream we’re looking with continuing Liquid adoption for spreads between exchanges to close, and more exchange liquidity to be available as a result and thereby reducing risk as the balance can be taken off the exchange when not trading and be ready to trade within 1-2mins.”
Bitcoin $7,200.09 Ripple $0.2218 Litecoin $43.69. Cryptocurrencies price prediction
The Bitcoin price on Wednesday is trading in the red by some 0.80%, as some near-term selling momentum picks up pace in the second half of the session.
Market bears have resumed pressure to the downside, following a brief period of stabilization. The price has breached a bearish pennant structure via the daily view and is further extending to the downside.
Ripple Technical Analysis: XRP/USD finds support at the hourly trendline
Ripple has consolidated on the hourly chart after dropping from 0.2338 to 0.2197.
The market has made a few higher lows but now looks to be testing lower levels.
0.22 is the psychological support zone and if taken out, could indicate lower levels are on the cards.
Litecoin Technical Analysis: LTC/USD lower highs spells danger
Litecoin price is trading in the red in the session by some 1.20%.
LTC/USD has extended to the downside, after breaking out of a bearish pennant pattern, inviting another round of selling.
The price is running towards its third consecutive session in the red.
Ukraine Law Allows New Use of Virtual Assets for Payments
Ukrainian legislature, Verkhovna Rada, recently approved a new set of amendments that clarify the legal status of virtual currencies. The legislators are trying to adopt FATF standards into national laws.
More clarity for cryptocurrencies
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is eyeing transparent regulation for digital currencies, which are often called the wild west of the financial world. The group suggests the creation of standard practices and regulations for digital currencies across the globe. Members of the organization also agreed to assess crypto regulations and monitor these rules. Ukrainian regulators are looking to create similar standards for the industry.
The new draft law aims to prevent the legalization of proceeds of financial crime and terrorism financing. It also seeks to stop financial routes that could boost the weapons of mass destruction. The Rada legislators approved the bill with a sizeable majority. It incorporates the use of virtual assets. According to the law, virtual assets are described as any property that expresses value digitally and can easily be traded or transferred. They also acknowledged that virtual assets could be used for either payment purposes or for making investments.
What does the law provide?
According to crypto media outlet Forklog, the law introduces a new term- “provider of services related to the transfer, exchange, and storage of virtual assets.” The law suggests that both corporate entities and private citizens will be allowed to offer services that accept digital currencies. However, the level of financial monitoring on the system will depend entirely on the destination and amount of the transaction.
The Ministry of Digital Transformation has been tasked to regulate digital currencies in the country. It will focus on verifying anti-money laundering compliance for all crypto transactions in the country. The legislation is prepared by Blockchain4Ukraine, a multi-partisan group in the parliament that promotes the use of distributed ledger technology. It is working alongside the Better Regulation Delivery Office (BRDO), EU-funded expertise and analytical center.
The first reading of the draft law took place on November 1 and the second reading happened last Friday. The adoption of cryptocurrency laws is a part of Ukraine’s commitments to the EU. Ukrinform reported that the regulation could help the country get a €500 million financial assistance from the Union. Traditionally, laws take at least three readings before adoption in Ukraine. The Rada has categorized the new crypto bill as “adopted” and “being prepared for signing” by the President.