One of the main drawbacks associated with the cryptocurrency market is its highly volatile price activity. The volatility was and still is, considered a major hindrance when it comes to the mass adoption of virtual assets. The introduction of stablecoins was meant to tackle this associated crypto-volatility. However, not all stablecoins operate the same way or are based on the same principles of work.
Linda Xie, Co-founder and Managing Director at Scalar Capital Management, recently spokeabout the future of stablecoins, on the basis of their contrasting credentials.
Xie classified the stablecoins industry as being centralized and decentralized assets, while also having dissimilar functionalities.
Speaking about centralized stablecoins, Xie took the example of USDC which is pegged 1:1 by USD in a bank. The advantage of a centralized stablecoin, she said, is the existence of a centralized entity that is responsible if anything goes wrong in terms of financial capacity. However, accessibility is limited to certain places and it will only be available if the individual resides in an area of “supported jurisdictions.”
Xie mentioned the case of DAI as a decentralized stablecoin, explaining that its major disadvantage in the market was its significant complexity and low stability, when compared to centralized stablecoins. The absence of potential censorship is also a plus point. However, the fact that no one central body would be liable if major issues surfaced with the asset is a price to pay.
“The lack of collateral and reliance solely on algorithms to get the price to be stable means a well funded, motivated individual or institution could attack the system and cause people to lose confidence in the stability of the model. This could then lead to a death spiral and the collapse of the stablecoin.”
Finally, Xie spoke about the inception of Hybrid stablecoins; Libra being a prime example, where the social media giant is trying to develop an asset-backed by a plethora of fiat currencies. Xie largely dismissed the idea of such stablecoins as they lose the “benefits” of both centralized and decentralized assets.
Xie concluded her analysis with the belief that centralized stablecoins will evolve over time, suggesting that the likes of USDC and DAI could co-exist in the ecosystem.
Recently, European Central Bank [ECB] had also shed light on the matter, stating that it did not consider virtual assets as a “threat to the financial stability of Europe.” The ECB believes that stablecoins had great potential as they were considerably less volatile than other assets like BTC, LTC, etc.
However, centralized assets have had their share of problems with Tether recently accused of not having their virtual assets completely backed 1:1 with fiat. Tether is one of the few regulated centralized stablecoins and the disputed allegations attached to it impacts the stablecoin market too.
Preston Byrne, Attorney at byrnestorm, had remarked back in 2017,
“A stablecoin that is collateralized by itself is a complex and fragile Nakamoto Scheme doomed to fail. A stablecoin that is collateralized by real assets and structured correctly is not a stablecoin, but a unit trust.”
XRP and Ethereum (ETH) Poised to Dominate Two Early Use Cases for Cryptocurrency: Ripple Executive Asheesh Birla
XRP and Ethereum are becoming increasingly dominant in two distinct, early use cases for cryptocurrency, according to Ripple senior vice president of product Asheesh Birla.
At the recent Goldman Sachs Technology and Internet Conference in San Francisco, Birla said he believes it will be difficult for competing companies and crypto assets to outperform XRP in the world of cross-border remittances.
The same is true for Ethereum, says Birla, when it comes to decentralized finance (DeFi), which is an umbrella term for a crypto-based push to automate and remove middlemen from traditional financial services like borrowing and lending.
“I think that Ethereum is really interesting in that over $1 billion in loans is the DeFi ecosystem. So they really own that narrative. They have products and an ecosystem around that narrative.
XRP, the digital asset that powers the Ripple network in any destination where our products are live – XRP is the most liquid digital asset. And so for cross-border payments and remittance products, I think that XRP will perform really well in those use cases. But everyone has to find their niche and use case and build that ecosystem. And the further ahead you get, the harder it is to dislodge.
So for example, with cross-border payment, I think it’s going to be increasingly hard to dislodge XRP. And with DeFi, as the ecosystem expands it will be increasingly hard to dislodge Ethereum because it’s so liquid for those use cases.”
Birla touts Ripple’s remittance volume between the US dollar and Mexican peso, which is on the rise thanks in large part to the company’s partnership with MoneyGram.
“One of the things I’m really proud of at Ripple is last week over at Ripple, using XRP, we did 7.5% of the total US dollar to Mexico remittance volume over our product. So things are moving. We’re seeing more projects with real-world adoption. We don’t need more experiments. We want to see this change the world.”
According to Birla, Ripple remains focused on giving financial institutions an easy way to use XRP to move money across borders. If Ripple’s mission is successful, he says expensive correspondent banks will no longer be needed to establish trust when moving capital from one place to another.
“Programming money is really good and in that there’s no intermediaries. It’s freely moving and for our products at Ripple that’s a big deal because today, if you want to move money across borders, you have to have relationships in each country you want to move money in. You have to have a bank account. You have to have pesos in Mexico. And now what you can do with digital assets and XRP is you just trust the digital asset to move into that country. You don’t need that bank account and you don’ need that pre-funding in Mexican pesos. You leverage, and between crypto exchanges there’s no legal agreement. They’re just trusting that the value will move using a digital asset. And that’s a game changer.
You can launch in a new country in a matter of weeks. We’re trying to get it down to days but you can launch in a matter of weeks. Before that, you have to open a bank account. You have to wire money down there. You have to get the right kind of regulations. That’s a big game changer. Again you’re removing expensive correspondent banks in the middle and you’re replacing it. You used to trust them but now you’re trusting a set of computers and digital assets and I think that’s a big deal.”
Cryptocurrencies price prediction: Ethereum & Litecoin – European Wrap
Ethereum Price Analysis: ETH/USD posts losses second day in a row, can $250 hold?
Ethereum price alongside other cryptocurrencies is losing ground from the yearly highs posted in February at $288. The losses remain unstoppable following the rejection at $280. At the time of writing, about 3% has been recorded in losses with ETH/USD having dropped from $265.66 (opening value) to $257 (market value). Recovery above $270 and $280 continues to be a pipe dream amid increased selling activity across the crypto space.
Ripple Price Analysis: XRP/USD golden cross hints return above $0.30
Ripple price is trading below the broken trendline support. However, it is strongly supported by the 61.8% Fib level of the last drop from $0.3463 to a low of $0.1766 at $0.26. In spite of the losses from the yearly highs at $0.3463 posted on February 15, XRP/USD is holding ground above the moving averages. A possible golden cross hints that bullish pressure is still present and could culminate in a push above the resistance at $0.28 and $0.30.
Cryptocurrency News Today – Headlines for February 25
- YouTube crypto purge has returned
- Sensationalism is the catalyst this time
- An algorithmic break caused the last purge
Cryptocurrency News Today – reports making rounds over the last few hours reveal that the YouTube crypto purge has returned. Per the report, this time, it seems sensationalism is the primary trigger behind the purge. One crypto YouTuber initially reported the YouTube crypto purge. It was famed tech and crypto YouTuber Ivan on Tech that raised the issue after a number of others.
Recall that despite the heavy clean out the last time, it now appears that there’s at least some explanation on the ongoing YouTube crypto purge. Even though the last YouTube crypto purge was more related to the FATF (Financial Action Task Force) regulatory guidelines and general inspections as opposed to YouTube’s guidelines, this might not be the case this time around.
Sensationalism Behind Current YouTube Crypto Purge
Among the crypto YouTubers that have been hit by the ongoing series of Youtube crypto purge, many have been affected. It has caused strikes and bans which affected the famed Crypto Wendy O, and Chico Crypto, along with a host of other channels. This time around the purge includes live streams. Ivan on Tech stated that the strike on his Twitter channel completely shocked him. Despite what Ivan believes, the title of his stream:
“BITCOIN GOING VERTICAL, Halving IMPORTANT UPDATE.”
It is obviously shouting sensationalism because Bitcoin and cryptos are not in YouTube’s good books. The trigger is the result of a pushover and not a biased ban. Similarly, Ivan was also promoting ByBit on his YouTube channel, which isn’t reputable enough leverage trading platform. Hence, the chances weren’t slim that Ivan would receive the strike that stopped him from initiating live streams on Youtube for a three month period.
An Algorithmic Break Caused the Last Purge
Crypto Wendy O added that their profiles received a strike as they were using a title that was similar to the above-mentioned title and the title shouted out sensationalism on YouTube. Here is how the title reads:
“BITCOIN MASSIVE DROP INCOMING – TAKE PROFIT.”
The crypto community overall is not used to such types of tactics to make profits off any affiliate programs as they would hurt the community. Meanwhile Director Wave Tech Tom Lombardi was critical of Ivan by using words like:
“@teamyoutube please keep blocking @ivanontech.
Recall that the last YouTube crypto purge was caused by an algorithmic break. At the time the Youtube representatives called the glitch an algorithmic break, but this time the case is different. It will appear the ongoing Youtube crypto purge on the affected channels is actually a direct result of what content creators did.