Connect with us


Ethereum’s bull run – the blockchain perspective

Ethereum has been experiencing a tremendous market momentum with a price increase of over 55 percent in this month. From a valuation standpoint, Ethereum has always been particularly complicated as it influenced not only by the performance of the native cryptocurrency but also all the token running on the Ethereum platform. That same characteristic makes it sometimes difficult to understand the factors influencing price movements. 

The recent Ethereum bull run has had marked footprints in the blockchain behavior of the crypto-asset. An analysis of the Ethereum blockchain reveals very interesting patterns that shed some light on the recent positive momentum as well as the current state of Ethereum from a financial standpoint.

As always, it is fascinating to compare some of the data points revealed by the blockchain datasets against traditional technical analysis methods.  

A technical analysis view of Ethereum’s price run

Ethereum technical analysis
Ethereum technical analysis (Source: IntoTheBlock)

A support-resistance analysis of Ether reveals that the crypto-asset recently broke out from the .618 Fibonacci level at $270. The next area of resistance would be around the $310 level, although there may be selling activity around $300 given that this represents a psychological threshold for most investors.

In terms of support, the recent $270 resistance is expected to turn into a buying area, as well as the trend line of the ascending channel in shorter time frames around $265.

The blockchain perspective

Utilizing statistical and machine learning methods to extract data from the blockchain, IntoTheBlock is able to formulate practical insights about underlying tokens. IntoTheBlock’s In/Out of the Money Around Current Price (IOMAP) uses machine learning to identify the ten most relevant clusters of investor positions at a range of plus-minus 15 percent of the current price. This provides granular analysis of the number of addresses and volume of tokens making or losing money close to the most recent price.

Since the IOMAP indicator quantifies individual holders’ positions, it offers an approximation of the investors that are susceptible to near-term price movements, which can act as a valuable complement to traditional support/resistance levels. 

By analyzing the Ethereum blockchain the IOMAP indicator tells us that there are 770,000 addresses that had previously bought between $301 and $309; a large number of addresses that may be looking to sell in this area to break-even on their positions close to the $310 technical resistance.

Ethereum In/Out Money Around Current Price
Ethereum In/Out Money Around Current Price (Source: IntoTheBlock)

However, sorting the IOMAP by volume suggests that the $300 psychological level may act as a stronger selling area. Looking closely at this indicator, we can see that almost 3.6 million ETH are concentrated in this cluster. While certainly not all of the ETH holders in this area are expected to sell, some of these over 700,000 addresses are likely to, especially after Ether’s remarkable recent price action. 

Ethereum In/Out Money Around Current Price (Source: IntoTheBlock)
Ethereum In/Out Money Around Current Price (Source: IntoTheBlock)

If Ether’s price starts to retrace, however, the buying areas from holders that may be looking to buy in again are not as strong up to the $260-$267 range, where over 500,000 addresses previously bought 2.88 million ETH. 

Ethereum In/Out Money Around Current Price (Source: IntoTheBlock)
Ethereum In/Out Money Around Current Price (Source: IntoTheBlock)

Additionally, by comparing the number of addresses currently making money in their positions to the equivalent at similar price levels, we are able to understand how momentum has shifted throughout that time.

This change in the addresses making money with their positions is displayed in IntoTheBlock’s Historical In/Out of the Money indicator. In Ether’s case, perhaps unsurprisingly, it is the buyers who have the momentum as nearly twice as many addresses are currently making money compared to the last time ETH price was at a similar range.

As can be seen in the graph below, 19.64 million Ether addresses were in the money earlier today, while that number was 10.84 million for a similar price in July 2019. This indicates that a significant amount of investors have been entering the market since last July, shifting the momentum to the bullish side.

Ethereum Historical In/Out of the Money
Ethereum Historical In/Out of the Money (Source: IntoTheBlock)

Lastly, IntoTheBlock’s Ownership by Time Held indicator shows that more people have been ‘hodling’ Ether than ever before. The number of addresses holding Ether for over a year has reached an all-time high at 19.39 million, more than double than the 8.4 million last February. This suggests that more investors are looking into Ether as a longer-term investment.

Ethereum Ownership by Time Held
Ethereum Ownership by Time Held (Source: IntoTheBlock)

Overall, data stored on the Ethereum blockchain provides an understanding of Ether’s price rise from a different perspective. IntoTheBlock’s indicators suggest an increase in momentum among holders, with almost twice as many addresses making money on their positions compared to half a year ago at a similar price. Having recently surpassed the $270 resistance, the next level expected with large selling pressure is expected to be at $300, where over 3.5 million Ether was previously bought. With more addresses hodling than ever before and momentum on the bullish side, Ethereum is certainly a project to keep an eye out for in 2020. 

News Source

Click to comment


DeFi Project bZx Exploited for Second Time in a Week, Loses $630K in Ether

Bad actors have made off with $630,000-worth of the ether (ETH) cryptocurrency after exploiting a price feed of the ethereum-based lending project bZx.

The attack – the second in less than a week – began at just after 03:00 UTC Tuesday, when attackers apparently took out a flash loan of 7,500 ETH (approximately US$1.98 million), using 3,518 ETH (~$939,300) to purchase synthetic USD stablecoin sUSD from the issuer, which they then posted as collateral for a bZx loan, according to an analyst on Twitter.

They then used 900 ETH (~$240,000) to bid up the value of sUSD through an integrated price feed from liquidity provider Kyber Network until the dollar stablecoin spiked at $2. Using this inflated collateral, they took out another loan of 6,796 ETH (roughly $1.8 million) that was used to pay back the original 7,500 ETH loan, pocketing the remaining 2,378 ETH.

The total amount stolen is worth approximately $633,000, according to CoinDesk’s Ether Price Index. In its entirety, the attack took just over a minute from beginning to end. The exploiters have left an open loan with half the required collateral now that sUSD has returned to its dollar pegging.

The total amount of ether locked in bZx lending contracts has nearly halved from 40,000 ETH (~$10.7 million) to 23,000 ETH (~$6.1 million) since the exploit took place, according to statistics site DeFi Pulse.

Source: DeFi Pulse

The official Twitter account for bZx confirmed at 04:38 UTC the project had suspended trading after it detected “suspicious transactions using flash loans and trading on Synthetix.” A bZx spokesperson confirmed on the group’s Telegram channel the company itself, rather than any of the platform’s users, would cover the shortfall.

The attack comes days after bZx fell victim to a similar flash loan-based attack where more than $350,000-worth of cryptocurrencies were extracted from the platform. It’s unclear whether the two attacks were carried out by the same person or group.

What are flash loans?

The vast majority of DeFi lending facilities rely on overcollateralized loans: Borrowers can usually only borrow around 75 percent of the value of their collateral. Although that incentivizes users to pay back loans, it also requires lenders to have very high liquidity – sometimes in a diverse range of assets – in order to quickly liquidate loans.

Flash loans are instruments that allow traders to liquidate the loans on the lender’s behalf. It works by having the trader take a loan out from the lender – this time not posting any collateral – then paying back the borrower’s debt and collecting the deposit. Using the deposit they can pay back the original loan and pocket the remaining funds.

Flash loans were already available on other DeFi projects such as the non-custodial lending platform Aave Protocol, which has offered them since the beginning of the year.

bZx only launched its own flash loan instruments on Monday. CEO Tom Bean defended the decision to introduce flash loans onto the platform. “By all accounts, the flash loan code on bZx was not what allowed this attack. It was just a tool used that functioned correctly and could have been swapped out for dydx and Aave flash loans,” he wrote on the company’s Telegram channel.

Kyle Kistner, bZx’s chief visionary officer and operations lead, confirmed, also on Telegram, the flash loan hack was “completely tractable.” He highlighted that bZx would accelerate plans to integrate Chainlink to diversify price feeds and prevent oracle manipulations from happening again.

A representative for bZx told CoinDesk the team was trying to resolve the exploit with its team of engineers. Bean and Kistner did not immediately return calls for comment.


Continue Reading


Ethereum should consolidate position above $300 by mid-March

Over the past four days, Ethereum has recorded significant price volatility. After registering a significant dump of around 18 percent over 15-16 February, the market’s 2nd largest crypto-asset jumped right back above the $270 mark. Over the past 24 hours, Ethereum had recorded a positive turn around of 8.01 percent, with a market cap of over $30 billion.

Source: ETH/USD on TradingView

On observing Ethereum’s 1-day chart, it can be identified that the surge on 30 January was a bullish breakout that surfaced due to the formation of a long-term cup and handle pattern. The pattern started developing towards the end of November 2019 and took shape over the last 3 months.

After the spike on 30 January, Ethereum inevitability breached past its key resistance at $229 (i.e acting support, at present) and the token has since, managed to consolidate over the $250 mark. The aforementioned correction on 15 February did bring it below $250 for 24 hours, but the price bounced right back.

At press time, the bullish momentum was picking up pace again. Hence, there is a possibility that ETH may cross $300 over the next few days. However, it would be short-lived.

A minor correction down to $251 would allow the token to successfully head towards the $303 resistance by mid-March and consolidate above the range for a longer period of time.

However, according to the VPVR indicator, trading volume at $229 has been strong over the past six months and repeated corrections from 15 February may allow retracement down till the $229 support.

Ethereum/Bitcoin 1-hour chart

Source: ETH/BTC on TradingView

However, on observing the ETH/BTC 1-hour chart, a re-test down to $229 seems less likely for Ethereum. According to the chart, an inverted head and shoulder pattern had been breached at press time, which suggested that the 2nd largest asset is primed for another bullish surge. A breakout after a head and shoulder is heavily bullish, something that improves the probability of Ethereum crossing $300 in the short-term. Concerns about another bearish pullback will remain after the bullish momentum faces timely exhaustion over the next few weeks.


It is possible Ethereum may breach the $300 mark resistance over the next few days, but a quick retracement will follow that. After a pullback, the token should consolidate between $251-$279, before eventually marching past $303 by mid-march.

News Source

Continue Reading


Almost $1 Million Of ETH Compromised Following Two Attacks On DeFi Protocol bZx

The space of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) took a serious hit in the past week as decentralized lending protocol went through two subsequent attacks. The compromised funds amount to a little less than $1 million.

The First Attack On bZx – February 14th

The first attack happened on block 9484588, timestamped February 15th, according to the official report from bZx. Per the document, the attack was launched on Valentine’s day on February 14th during ETHDenver. At that time, bZx’s team has been out attending the event.

The attacker took advantage of a few DeFi protocols to lend and swap a substantial amount of ETH and wrapped Bitcoin (wBTC). The latter represents a token launched on Ethereum’s network, tracking the price of Bitcoin. This allowed the perpetrator to manipulate the prices and to profit off of decentralized leveraged trade.

First, the attacker borrowed 10,000 ETH from dYdX – a decentralized lending protocol. He then used 5,500 ETH to collateralize a loan for 112 wBTC on Compound – another lending protocol. After that, he spent 1,300 ETH to open a 5x leveraged ETH/BTC short position on the Fulcrum trading platform of bZx, while also borrowing 5,637 ETH through Kyber’s. This amount he swapped for 51 wBTC, causing a serious slippage.

This allowed the perpetrator to profit from swapping the 112 wBTC from Compound to 6,671 ETH and generate an income of 1,193 ETH. That’s roughly around $318,000. At the end of it all, the attacker paid back the 10,00 ETH loan on the dYdX protocol that he had taken before.You Might Also Like:

  • IOTA Releases Safe Version of Trinity Desktop But Mainnet Remains Suspended
  • IOTA Halts Network While Investigating Trinity Wallet Fund Thefts 
  • 260% Surge In DeFi-Locked Value In A Year: $1 Billion Already In

The Second Attack – February 18th, Details Pending

The bZx team has also officially confirmed the second attack.

Per the official disclosure, the attacker managed to extract a net profit from the system of around $600,000, bringing the losses up to more than $900,000 worth of ETH. However, the mechanism of the second attack was completely different than the first one.

The issue at hand had a lot to do with oracle manipulation. Oracles typically represent centralized components that provide external information to on-chain apps.

In light of the above, the bZx team has also stated that they are working closely with Chainlink, as well as with other oracle providers to “create a more robust oracle and reduce the surface area of attacks against our protocol.”

Purportedly, the team managed to delay the realization of the profits from the second attack and stated that they “believe the system can recover from this.”

More Security Audits And Research Is Vital, Says The CEO of Aave

CryptoPotato managed to get the opinion of Stani Kulechov, CEO at Aave – an open-source DeFi Protocol.

Explaining the attack in simpler words, he said that a “flash loan was used to get capital without owning it. The attack was possible without a flash loan as well if the person would have such a big amount of cryptocurrency in possession. Flash Loans are testing the waters of DeFi. Every DeFi protocol needs to mitigate the risks that flash loans can create. They are not bad as they can be used to create innovative products such as collateral swaps that we’re building on top of Aave Flash Loans.”

He also outlined that every line of code presents a risk that needs to be mitigated.

More security audits and research is vital. Risk should be properly assessed before deploying new protocols.

News Source

Continue Reading