Connect with us

Ripple

Ripple onboards 2 new customers/week for RippleNet, says GM

Published

on

  • Ripple Labs and MoneyGram have together decided to “wind down” their current partnership agreement.
  • An average of two new customers are onboarded for RippleNet each week, according to GM Asheesh Birla. 

After Ripple and MoneyGram announced the suspension of their partnership a few days ago, the two partners now informed that they are “winding down” their current agreement. At the same time, however, MoneyGram and Ripple have also committed to “revisiting” a renewed partnership “in the future,” as Brad Garlinghouse revealed via Twitter.

As the Ripple Labs CEO also noted, the “lack of a crypto regulatory framework has unnecessarily muddied the waters for U.S. businesses and consumers.” Still, Garlinghouse describes the partnership as a great success. Together, the two partners have sent and transacted “billions of dollars” across borders via On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) using XRP. A blog post from Ripple added:

We are both committed to revisiting our relationship in the future. We still believe in the promise of digital assets and blockchain technology to change the status quo in global payments for the benefit of billions of consumers around the world.

Ripple signs two new customers per week

Meanwhile, Asheesh Birla, general manager of RippleNet, assured that strong growth continues to be recorded. The company is onboarding an average of two new customers per week for RippleNet while he predicts that it will be deployed globally once regulatory clarity is achieved, Birla said:

ODL solves a real problem for consumers left behind by traditional financial services, providing them with a low cost, fast, transparent and secure option. Regulatory clarity will come as govts understand the value in this tech for financial inclusion and instant settlement.

RippleNet continues to grow (~2 new customers/week), with a strong balance sheet allowing us to expand ODL, and pilot new solutions like LOC. As the world clamors for crypto-enabled services, we’re absolutely confident in RN’s product-market fit, monetization and global use.

Advertisement

In a comment under Birla’s tweet, respected XRP community member Leonidas Hadjiloizou questioned why Ripple changed its website representation “from 300+ to hundreds” of customers. As Hadjiloizou noted, this number has not been updated since the 2019 Swell update. Birla did not yet respond to rumors in the comments about whether Ripple has lost other customers besides MoneyGram.

Advertisement

Ripple Vs SEC

Court Orders SEC to Answer Ripple’s Interrogatories

Published

on

ripple-v-SEC

Ripple, however, has failed to bury the SEC in paperwork, with the judge granting the agency’s motion for a protection order against “unduly burdensome” requests

Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn has ordered the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to answer some of Ripple’s hotly-contested interrogatories, which are meant to determine whether or not the plaintiff’s contentions can be supported by facts. 

The agency will have to specify why the company’s XRP sales are investment contracts:

The SEC’s legal theory is not an excuse to avoid responding to Defendants’ factual inquiry. Nor is it a basis to answer a different question than posed.

In addition, the SEC will have to state whether it believes that Ripple’s efforts were key to boosting the price of XRP.

However, Ripple’s interrogatory about whether or not the XRP Ledger was fully functional prior to the start of the securities offering has been denied for being too vague:

Advertisement

The Court agrees that this interrogatory seeks relevant information. But Defendants’ interrogatory is too vague for the reasons identified by the SEC.

Netburn has also granted the SEC’s motion for a protective order, which allows the regulator not to respond to all of Ripple’s “unreasonably burdensome” interrogatories.

The agency claimed that covering all the 29,947 requests would take 104 days without “breaks or sleep.”

Earlier this week, the court also granted the SEC’s motion to extend the expert discovery deadline to Jan. 14, 2022, despite Ripple’s protestations.

Advertisement

News Source

Continue Reading

Ripple

Ripple CEO Says the SEC Helped Ethereum to Surpass XRP as No.2 Crypto

Published

on

  • Ripple CEO aired his opinion on the crypto market and regulations.
  • Brad Garlinghouse said the US SEC granted Ethereum regulatory green light.

At the DC Fintech Week virtual conference on October 21, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghounse aired his thoughts on the state of the crypto market and regulations. Besides, he holds a grudge over the financial regulator’s approach to Ethereum.

In addition, Garlinghouse declared that the US Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) granted Ethereum regulatory green light that enabled it to surpass his firm’s XRP token.

Likewise, the Ripple boss feels that his firm has been played out. But, at the same time, Ethereum’s subsequent success is at least in part down to more favorable treatment by the US SEC. Also, Garlinghouse stated that it is affecting its market. He said,

“Within the last few years, XRP was the second most valuable digital asset. As it became clear the SEC had given a hall pass to ETH, ETH obviously has exploded, and that clarity has helped.”

To clarify, XRP was the second-largest crypto asset by market cap in late December 2017. But, currently, it has dropped to seventh place while Ethereum has kept the second spot ever since.

Advertisement

Furthermore, the reason why XRP dropped is the US SEC pursuing Ripple over claims that XRP is unregistered security. In fact, in January, Ripple filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the US SEC demanding to know why it didn’t consider ETH security.

As a result, later in July, a district judge allowed the firm to depose a former official who declared in 2018 that ETH was not a security.

News Source

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ripple

Ripple CEO reinstates SEC bias towards ETH, claiming XRP could’ve been No.2

Published

on


It is not news that the ongoing XRP lawsuit has got the better of Ripple’s XRP token. Ripple CEO, Brad Garlinghouse recently questioned the SEC’s bias towards Ethereum, claiming that XRP would’ve been at the No. 2 position instead of ETH if it weren’t for the commission’s partial crackdown. Garlinghouse spoke at the DC Fintech Week virtual conference yesterday, arguing that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission alleged Ripple’s XRP as unregistered security while granting Ethereum a regulatory free pass, which in turn helped ETH shoot through the roof.

“Within the last few years, XRP was the second most valuable digital asset. As it became clear the SEC had given a hall pass to ETH, ETH obviously has kind of exploded and that clarity has helped.”

XRP secured the position of the second-largest crypto asset by market capitalization during the latter half of 2017. However, the token has dropped down to seventh place while Ethereum stands strong as No. 2. Furthermore, Garlinghouse claims that the SEC’s exclusively aggressive anti-crypto stance to allegedly protect the consumers is in fact anti-investors. Referring to the XRP lawsuit, Ripple CEO emphasizes that “nearly 50,000 U.S. people who hold XRP who are trying to sue the SEC for ‘protecting them’”.

XRP Holders left with bearish and frozen funds

Earlier this week, Attorney Deaton Filed a Letter Motion on behalf of the XRP Holders (Movants) that contended SEC’s extension request, with the main argument concerning the XRP holders’ frozen funds because of the consistent postponement of the lawsuit’s final verdict. During the ongoing bull run, XRP remains considerably bear because of the regulatory crackdown on Ripple. However, the court has overlooked the community’s concern and granted the extension explaining that in lieu of pending motions, extra time will only facilitate both parties to complete pending fact discovery and thoroughly prepare for upcoming expert depositions.

Advertisement

“The lack of liquidity within the United States, coupled with the mass de-listings prevents XRP Holders from trading, selling, transferring, or converting their XRP. It is because of this de facto in place seizure of their property that XRP Holders took the extraordinary step to seek intervention as defendants… Any delay in the underlying action marks yet another day XRP Holders do not have access to their funds.”, wrote Deaton.

News Source

Continue Reading