Judge Denies XRP Holders’ Motion to Intervene in SEC v. Ripple Case

XRP holders have lost their bid to intervene in Ripple’s legal battle with the SEC as a third-party defendant

Federal Judge Analisa Torres has denied XRP investors’ motion to intervene in the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission against Ripple in December.

The decision has nipped in the bud the effort to put the SEC on the defensive.

It is worth noting that the motion was denied without prejudice to renewal, meaning that it can be refiled at a later date if investors want to try again.

However, the deadline for adding new parties to the case is March 17. Ripple will likely continue its legal battle against the regulator without a helping hand from the XRP Army.

Related
Ripple Asks Court to Force SEC to Produce Documents Regarding Bitcoin and Ethereum

A major setback for XRP holders

As reported by U.Today, John Deaton of Deaton Law Firm filed a motion to intervene on behalf of thousands of XRP holders, accusing the SEC of causing over $15 billion in losses with its enforcement action against Ripple.

If the motion had been approved, the owners of the token would have inserted themselves into the lawsuit as third-party defendants.

Earlier this month, they withdrew a petition for a writ of mandamus that was filed in Rhode Island federal court to make the SEC amend its complaint.

In its motion to dismiss the petition, the agency dismantled XRP holders’ claims, asserting that they had failed to allege that exchanges would “reverse course.”

Multiple cryptocurrency trading platforms started delisting the token or suspending its trading in early January, prompting a sharp price drop. Kraken CEO Jesse Powell recently spoke out about XRP trading curbs, claiming that the cryptocurrency presents a “huge asymmetrical risk” for exchanges.

News Source