Connect with us

Ripple Vs SEC

Ripple Cites Viral Tweet on Status of XRP in Legal Battle Against SEC

Published

on

Ripple is citing a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) letter to a retail investor in its ongoing legal battle against the top US regulator.

A Twitter user named “Frank” claims that he reached out to the SEC after buying XRP to see whether he purchased a security.

In a viral tweet, the user shared a screenshot of the SEC’s response, which indicated that as of October 2020, the regulator hadn’t issued a determination on the digital asset’s status as a security.

Advertisement

Ripple is citing a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) letter to a retail investor in its ongoing legal battle against the top US regulator.

A Twitter user named “Frank” claims that he reached out to the SEC after buying XRP to see whether he purchased a security.

In a viral tweet, the user shared a screenshot of the SEC’s response, which indicated that as of October 2020, the regulator hadn’t issued a determination on the digital asset’s status as a security.

Advertisement

Two months later, the SEC filed a lawsuit alleging Ripple offered XRP as an unregistered security.

Ripple is now citing Frank’s SEC email exchange in a court filing. The San Francisco company is using the letter in regard to statements made by William Hinman, the former director of the SEC’s Division of Corporate Finance, who says he told a Ripple official that he viewed XRP as an unregistered security.

Advertisement

Ripple says the email is evidence Hinman’s testimony “is refuted by the SEC’s own communications to the public.”

According to Ripple, Hinman’s description of the SEC’s early history with crypto assets also shows why the SEC’s case is flawed.

“Merely by way of example, Mr. Hinman admitted that prior to him joining the SEC in 2017 – but years into the alleged unregistered securities offering by Ripple – the application of the federal securities laws to digital assets was ‘new for everyone’ and no one knew a whole lot’…

Advertisement

He further admitted that he could not recall any specific work product generated at the time he joined the SEC relating to federal securities laws and bitcoin, ether or XRP and did not ‘think people had completely thought through all the ways… the securities laws may apply to that activity.’

This testimony, the documents produced – and potentially the documents that should be produced in discovery as a result of Defendants’ Motion – fatally undermine the SEC’s allegations that the Individual Defendants acted recklessly in failing to recognize Ripple’s sales of XRP as an unregistered securities offering as at that time, securities law experts of Mr. Hinman’s stature (to say nothing of the full Commission) had not reached that conclusion themselves, despite looking into the issue.”

Attorney James Filan, who is closely tracking the case, has put together an outline of key dates ahead.

Advertisement

The end of the discovery process, which allows both parties to learn what the other knows about the evidence in the case, is set to end on August 31st.

News Source

Advertisement

Ripple

SEC v. Ripple: More than 50,000 XRP holders and ‘friends’ want to

Published

on

ripple-v-SEC

The SEC v. Ripple Labs lawsuit is soon to enter mid-fall. Alas, the theme of the season seems to be extensions and delays as both parties are divided over the same.

Just recently, the American regulator requested that the expert rebuttal report deadline be moved to 12 November and expert discovery be pushed to 2022.

However, another group wants to be heard. John E. Deaton, Counsel for Amici Curiae – or “friends of the court” – has now filed a letter asking U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres to consider the views of XRP holders.

Advertisement

A ‘friend’s’ perspective

Though Deaton is worried about “annoying” the court, his filing referenced the SEC’s call for a two-month extension. He requested,

“…please accept this letter to serve as both the application for XRP Holders to offer their perspective, as well as an offer of proof of said perspective.”

What’s more, Deaton confirmed that he will not repeat any points made by the defendants in this case. Even so, he stated,

“In opposing the SEC’s request for this delay, Ripple’s argument focuses on how the “freezing” of XRP markets within the United States impacts Ripple. The negative impact on XRP Holders is even more profound.”

So, how many investors reportedly really want to join the crypto-lawyer? Well, Deaton claimed that as of 19 October, over 50,000 XRP holders had reached out to him in order to be part of the “putative class.”

Advertisement

As previously reported, the San Francisco-based blockchain company consented to push the rebuttal report deadline to 12 November. However, it is against the expert discovery deadline being moved to 14 January. Ripple opposed the extension, claiming that “further delay would prejudice Ripple and the market for XRP.”

For his part, Deaton also noted that many major exchanges had de-listed XRP due to its legal troubles in the USA. Additionally, he also pointed out that XRP in retirement brokerage accounts had been “frozen.”

Advertisement

In essence, Deaton claimed,

“Any delay in the underlying action marks yet another day XRP Holders do not have access to their funds.”

Checking in on XRP
One source of contention in recent days has been how the SEC’s extension request would affect XRP’s performance. The SEC claimed that XRP sales are “robust” and that the asset had seen price rises even during the lawsuit. Ripple, however, claimed that despite the rise in price, XRP has been “lagging behind the market.”

Advertisement

At press time, XRP was trading at $1.10, well below the levels it hit a few months ago.

News Source

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ripple

XRP Lawsuit: Ripple objects further extensions in lieu of frozen XRP markets

Published

on


The latest update in the XRP lawsuit saw Ripple file an opposition to the SEC’s letter seeking a two-month extension of the Court-ordered expert discovery deadline, dragging the case further into the new year. Ripple noted that while it agreed to extend the deadline for rebuttal expert reports to November 12, expert discovery should not be extended beyond December 10.  Ripple asserted that extending expert discovery to January 2022 will “unduly prejudice” Ripple and continue to “freeze” XRP markets in the United States.

XRP remains bearish during the ongoing bull run

As other tokens are enjoying the ongoing bull run, XRP continues to stay bearish because of the lawsuit. Ripple suggested that the court should consider whether allowing further modifications in the schedule at this stage of the litigation will prejudice defendants. The defendants argue that with every additional day this suit is pending is another day where the XRP markets remain frozen, and these are the markets that Ripple depends on for its product offerings, therefore it is “severely prejudicial” to Ripple’s business.

“The SEC’s claim that its proposed extension “would not prejudice Defendants in any material way” ignores the obvious. The pendency of this lawsuit has significantly hurt the markets for XRP, especially in the United States. Ripple’s cross-border payment product relies on liquid XRP markets. The SEC well knows that within days of it filing its suit, almost 20 exchanges de-listed or suspended XRP trading in the United States,1 and more have since followed suit, critically damaging the market for XRP.”

SEC’s December 17 compromise exposed

Ripple also highlighted the SEC’s hypocritical move in approaching the defendants for a compromise that it eventually agreed to but filed a completely different motion. The defense noted that the plaintiff’s initial proposal that was made just three days before it filed this motion, was to extend the expert discovery deadline to December 22. The day before the SEC filed its motion, Ripple offered the December 10 deadline, to which the SEC disagreed and proposed December 17. However, on the very day, the commission filed a motion appealing for an extension of expert discovery to January 14, 2022, it also represented to Ripple that discovery could be completed nearly one month earlier, by December 17.

Advertisement

News Source

Continue Reading

Ripple

XRP Lawsuit: Ripple says discovery deadline extension would be ‘severely prejudicial’

Published

on

ripple-v-SEC

The lawsuit filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), against blockchain company, Ripple Labs for selling unregistered securities is inching closer to being a year old while showing no signs of settling soon.

Even as the SEC is trying to delay deadlines fixed earlier by the court, Ripple is putting in similar efforts to wrap up the case as quickly as possible. In a motion opposing the SEC’s previous request for a deadline extension on fact discovery to 12 January, the defendant asked the court on 19 October that the SEC’s proposal be denied on several grounds.

Ripple agreed to extend the deadline for rebuttal, expert reports to 12 November even as it “is prepared to meet the original schedule.” Further, the firm proposed that the deadline for expert depositions be extended no further than 10 December, as this would provide sufficient time between the two procedures.

Advertisement

Ripple has claimed that before the SEC filed its motion for an extension on 15 October, both parties had sought to reach an agreement without court intervention. Further, the SEC had originally proposed extending the close of expert discovery to 22 December, which Ripple had agreed to despite being able to meet the original deadline set by the court.

With the SEC changing its tune, Ripple sought the court’s help in preventing the lawsuit from being prolonged further. The court itself had frowned upon permitting further delay after the previous deadline extension for discovery.

The main reason behind Ripple’s opposition is the fact that “further delay would prejudice Ripple and the market for XRP.” Highlighting the losses garnered by the company since the beginning of the lawsuit, the letter stated,

Advertisement

“The pendency of this lawsuit has significantly hurt the markets for XRP, especially in the United States. Ripple’s cross-border payment product relies on liquid XRP markets.”

It added,

“Within days of it filing its suit, almost 20 exchanges de-listed or suspended XRP trading in the United States, and more have since followed suit, critically damaging the market for XRP. This is severely prejudicial to Ripple’s business.”

Advertisement

However, the regulatory authority insisted that Ripple has “continued robust sales of XRP” along with experiencing price rises during the pendency of the litigation. The defendant stated that its overseas business and markets showed resilience during this time, which in no way meant that Ripple and XRP’s markets were not “severely damaged by the pendency of this lawsuit.” It further stated,

“Indeed, although the price of XRP has risen in the last year along with the broader digital currency market, its performance has lagged behind the market, including currencies like bitcoin and ether.”

Original Source 

Advertisement
Continue Reading