Connect with us

Ripple Vs SEC

SEC Legal Issue has Changed Nothing about the Goodness of Ripple (XRP)

Published

on

The Ripple (XRP) team are staying fit and over the skies as they are working as a team to consistently scale new heights.

The SEC legal issue has changed nothing about the goodness of Ripple (XRP). They are continuing to hire to build a great team to progress ahead with the next generation of Fintech. Many of them are willing to join the team from different parts of the world. And, many wish they hand the skills.  Many of them are willing to take a job sitting around talking about XRP all day.

The XRPL ledger is suited to home the transactions of NFTs. For now, NFTs as collectibles is a very big use case.

Advertisement

David Schwartz, Ripple’s CTO, pointed to how the white-hot NFT trend is suitable for the XRP ledger. David also suggested that we are just scratching the surface. The CTO of Ripple envisions a future where NFTs become the foundation of all the digital rights management. David strongly believes the XRP Ledger delivers a unique combination of the low cost, high speed and good payments features needed to streamline NFT creation at scale. Particularly, the Ledger’s ability to maintain consistent transaction fees, a trait that is impossible on most other platforms today.

Community response:  In the Ripple Drop Video, David says Private Federated Sidechains for Central Banks will be ready in 2 months and for DeFi in 6 -9.  Didn’t I say the XRPL is lit?

I’m keeping surprised about their new focus. It was focused already.  “We are going to be laser focused on this issue (cross border)” And now, it’s NFT CBDC DeFi as if the first is already all set and done, which I know it is.  So, once it is clear, it will RUN.

Advertisement

Less blabbing and get working on running NFT’s on the XRPL before Ethereum moves on to something new and Ripple has to play catch up again.

Bitcoin and Ethereum are protected by people who are paid by legacy banking/foreign powers, pumping their price to make it more appealing to desperate people. All while holding down American innovation. Bitcoin and Ethereum are dead-end projects.

Irrespective of how the rest of the crypto space is progressing, Ripple is amazing.

Advertisement

Ultimately, as Brad Garlinghouse expressed, This has been clear from the start — the SEC’s lawsuit isn’t just about Ripple, it’s about what “ impossible standards of fair notice and due process” through regulation by enforcement can do to crypto innovation. “Anyone could be next without warning.”

Ripple

SEC v. Ripple: More than 50,000 XRP holders and ‘friends’ want to

Published

on

ripple-v-SEC

The SEC v. Ripple Labs lawsuit is soon to enter mid-fall. Alas, the theme of the season seems to be extensions and delays as both parties are divided over the same.

Just recently, the American regulator requested that the expert rebuttal report deadline be moved to 12 November and expert discovery be pushed to 2022.

However, another group wants to be heard. John E. Deaton, Counsel for Amici Curiae – or “friends of the court” – has now filed a letter asking U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres to consider the views of XRP holders.

Advertisement

A ‘friend’s’ perspective

Though Deaton is worried about “annoying” the court, his filing referenced the SEC’s call for a two-month extension. He requested,

“…please accept this letter to serve as both the application for XRP Holders to offer their perspective, as well as an offer of proof of said perspective.”

What’s more, Deaton confirmed that he will not repeat any points made by the defendants in this case. Even so, he stated,

“In opposing the SEC’s request for this delay, Ripple’s argument focuses on how the “freezing” of XRP markets within the United States impacts Ripple. The negative impact on XRP Holders is even more profound.”

So, how many investors reportedly really want to join the crypto-lawyer? Well, Deaton claimed that as of 19 October, over 50,000 XRP holders had reached out to him in order to be part of the “putative class.”

Advertisement

As previously reported, the San Francisco-based blockchain company consented to push the rebuttal report deadline to 12 November. However, it is against the expert discovery deadline being moved to 14 January. Ripple opposed the extension, claiming that “further delay would prejudice Ripple and the market for XRP.”

For his part, Deaton also noted that many major exchanges had de-listed XRP due to its legal troubles in the USA. Additionally, he also pointed out that XRP in retirement brokerage accounts had been “frozen.”

Advertisement

In essence, Deaton claimed,

“Any delay in the underlying action marks yet another day XRP Holders do not have access to their funds.”

Checking in on XRP
One source of contention in recent days has been how the SEC’s extension request would affect XRP’s performance. The SEC claimed that XRP sales are “robust” and that the asset had seen price rises even during the lawsuit. Ripple, however, claimed that despite the rise in price, XRP has been “lagging behind the market.”

Advertisement

At press time, XRP was trading at $1.10, well below the levels it hit a few months ago.

News Source

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ripple

XRP Lawsuit: Ripple objects further extensions in lieu of frozen XRP markets

Published

on


The latest update in the XRP lawsuit saw Ripple file an opposition to the SEC’s letter seeking a two-month extension of the Court-ordered expert discovery deadline, dragging the case further into the new year. Ripple noted that while it agreed to extend the deadline for rebuttal expert reports to November 12, expert discovery should not be extended beyond December 10.  Ripple asserted that extending expert discovery to January 2022 will “unduly prejudice” Ripple and continue to “freeze” XRP markets in the United States.

XRP remains bearish during the ongoing bull run

As other tokens are enjoying the ongoing bull run, XRP continues to stay bearish because of the lawsuit. Ripple suggested that the court should consider whether allowing further modifications in the schedule at this stage of the litigation will prejudice defendants. The defendants argue that with every additional day this suit is pending is another day where the XRP markets remain frozen, and these are the markets that Ripple depends on for its product offerings, therefore it is “severely prejudicial” to Ripple’s business.

“The SEC’s claim that its proposed extension “would not prejudice Defendants in any material way” ignores the obvious. The pendency of this lawsuit has significantly hurt the markets for XRP, especially in the United States. Ripple’s cross-border payment product relies on liquid XRP markets. The SEC well knows that within days of it filing its suit, almost 20 exchanges de-listed or suspended XRP trading in the United States,1 and more have since followed suit, critically damaging the market for XRP.”

SEC’s December 17 compromise exposed

Ripple also highlighted the SEC’s hypocritical move in approaching the defendants for a compromise that it eventually agreed to but filed a completely different motion. The defense noted that the plaintiff’s initial proposal that was made just three days before it filed this motion, was to extend the expert discovery deadline to December 22. The day before the SEC filed its motion, Ripple offered the December 10 deadline, to which the SEC disagreed and proposed December 17. However, on the very day, the commission filed a motion appealing for an extension of expert discovery to January 14, 2022, it also represented to Ripple that discovery could be completed nearly one month earlier, by December 17.

Advertisement

News Source

Continue Reading

Ripple

XRP Lawsuit: Ripple says discovery deadline extension would be ‘severely prejudicial’

Published

on

ripple-v-SEC

The lawsuit filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), against blockchain company, Ripple Labs for selling unregistered securities is inching closer to being a year old while showing no signs of settling soon.

Even as the SEC is trying to delay deadlines fixed earlier by the court, Ripple is putting in similar efforts to wrap up the case as quickly as possible. In a motion opposing the SEC’s previous request for a deadline extension on fact discovery to 12 January, the defendant asked the court on 19 October that the SEC’s proposal be denied on several grounds.

Ripple agreed to extend the deadline for rebuttal, expert reports to 12 November even as it “is prepared to meet the original schedule.” Further, the firm proposed that the deadline for expert depositions be extended no further than 10 December, as this would provide sufficient time between the two procedures.

Advertisement

Ripple has claimed that before the SEC filed its motion for an extension on 15 October, both parties had sought to reach an agreement without court intervention. Further, the SEC had originally proposed extending the close of expert discovery to 22 December, which Ripple had agreed to despite being able to meet the original deadline set by the court.

With the SEC changing its tune, Ripple sought the court’s help in preventing the lawsuit from being prolonged further. The court itself had frowned upon permitting further delay after the previous deadline extension for discovery.

The main reason behind Ripple’s opposition is the fact that “further delay would prejudice Ripple and the market for XRP.” Highlighting the losses garnered by the company since the beginning of the lawsuit, the letter stated,

Advertisement

“The pendency of this lawsuit has significantly hurt the markets for XRP, especially in the United States. Ripple’s cross-border payment product relies on liquid XRP markets.”

It added,

“Within days of it filing its suit, almost 20 exchanges de-listed or suspended XRP trading in the United States, and more have since followed suit, critically damaging the market for XRP. This is severely prejudicial to Ripple’s business.”

Advertisement

However, the regulatory authority insisted that Ripple has “continued robust sales of XRP” along with experiencing price rises during the pendency of the litigation. The defendant stated that its overseas business and markets showed resilience during this time, which in no way meant that Ripple and XRP’s markets were not “severely damaged by the pendency of this lawsuit.” It further stated,

“Indeed, although the price of XRP has risen in the last year along with the broader digital currency market, its performance has lagged behind the market, including currencies like bitcoin and ether.”

Original Source 

Advertisement
Continue Reading