Connect with us

Ripple

Ethereum’s Joe Lubin Defends SEC Amid Ripple Lawsuit

Published

on

Ethereum’s Joe Lubin has voiced his support for the SEC, claiming that the agency is not stifling innovation

As the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is facing a barrage of criticism for its scattershot approach to regulating cryptocurrencies, the much-feared regulatory agency has found a supporter within the industry: ConsenSys CEO Joseph Lubin.

In a recent interview with The Information, Lubin, who is known as one of Ethereum’s co-founders, claims that SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s demands for greater authority in regulating crypto are justified.

The head of Ethereum’s development studio says that the agency has a lot of “legit arguments”:

[The SEC] may have legit arguments in the cases that are being discussed right now.

While Ripple, the company that was sued by the SEC in December over its unregistered securities sales, accuses the agency of stifling innovation in the U.S., Lubin does not think that this is the case:

Advertisement

I don’t believe the SEC is trying to squelch innovation.

 Ripple is adamant that XRP was treated unfairly by the SEC since, unlike Ether, it has never received regulatory clarity.

A speech by William Hinman, the SEC’s former top official, in which he said that Ether was not an unregistered security, became a breeding ground for conspiracy theories about potential interest within the XRP community. Some are convinced that Hinman had skin in the game merely because of his ties to the Simpson Thacher law firm, which is a member of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance.

Yet the SEC made clear that it had not taken an official position on its regulatory status, and Hinman was only expressing his personal opinion.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse is careful about his word choice, steering clear of peddling “free pass” conspiracy theories. In a recent interview, however, he said that the timing of the lawsuit was “suspicious.”

Advertisement

News Source

Ripple

Ripple CEO reinstates SEC bias towards ETH, claiming XRP could’ve been No.2

Published

on


It is not news that the ongoing XRP lawsuit has got the better of Ripple’s XRP token. Ripple CEO, Brad Garlinghouse recently questioned the SEC’s bias towards Ethereum, claiming that XRP would’ve been at the No. 2 position instead of ETH if it weren’t for the commission’s partial crackdown. Garlinghouse spoke at the DC Fintech Week virtual conference yesterday, arguing that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission alleged Ripple’s XRP as unregistered security while granting Ethereum a regulatory free pass, which in turn helped ETH shoot through the roof.

“Within the last few years, XRP was the second most valuable digital asset. As it became clear the SEC had given a hall pass to ETH, ETH obviously has kind of exploded and that clarity has helped.”

XRP secured the position of the second-largest crypto asset by market capitalization during the latter half of 2017. However, the token has dropped down to seventh place while Ethereum stands strong as No. 2. Furthermore, Garlinghouse claims that the SEC’s exclusively aggressive anti-crypto stance to allegedly protect the consumers is in fact anti-investors. Referring to the XRP lawsuit, Ripple CEO emphasizes that “nearly 50,000 U.S. people who hold XRP who are trying to sue the SEC for ‘protecting them’”.

XRP Holders left with bearish and frozen funds

Earlier this week, Attorney Deaton Filed a Letter Motion on behalf of the XRP Holders (Movants) that contended SEC’s extension request, with the main argument concerning the XRP holders’ frozen funds because of the consistent postponement of the lawsuit’s final verdict. During the ongoing bull run, XRP remains considerably bear because of the regulatory crackdown on Ripple. However, the court has overlooked the community’s concern and granted the extension explaining that in lieu of pending motions, extra time will only facilitate both parties to complete pending fact discovery and thoroughly prepare for upcoming expert depositions.

Advertisement

“The lack of liquidity within the United States, coupled with the mass de-listings prevents XRP Holders from trading, selling, transferring, or converting their XRP. It is because of this de facto in place seizure of their property that XRP Holders took the extraordinary step to seek intervention as defendants… Any delay in the underlying action marks yet another day XRP Holders do not have access to their funds.”, wrote Deaton.

News Source

Continue Reading

Ripple

Top 3 Price Prediction Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP: Crypto bulls unfazed by flash crash

Published

on

  • Bitcoin price action initially shakes off strong selling pressure, finds buyers at support, then resumes some selling pressure.
  • Ethereum price action mixed post-all-time high rejection.
  • XRP price awaits its own bullish breakout and an opportunity to outperform its peers.

Bitcoin price closed more than 5% lower on the Thursday session, but buyers have stepped in to hold the Tenkan-Sen as support. Ethereum price action shows that the recent rejection has caused some indecision. XRP price does not have far to move to initiate a massive bullish breakout.

Bitcoin price continues to find buyers at the Tenkan-Sen

Bitcoin price has shown resilience and conviction since creating new all-time highs. There were broad concerns that due to Ethereum’s rejection of new all-time highs, Bitcoin might suffer a robust corrective move below the $60,000 value area. Although the Binance.US exchange did have an anomalous wick that saw Bitcoin return to the $8,000 level –that was the exception. If buyers can maintain the Tenkan-Sen as a primary support zone, then a move to test $70,000 is next.

BTC/USD Daily Ichimoku Chart

Market participants should be wary of the weekend. Weekends are notorious for whipsaws in price action and major sell-offs, especially on Sunday. Watch for sustained breaks below the Tenkaan-Sen to test the Kijun-Sen near the $55,000 value area.

Ethereum price may trap short-sellers if bulls push higher

Ethereum price action was almost comical during the Thursday trade session, with sellers preventing Ethereum from making new all-time highs by just $2.70 (depending on the exchange data). Even though Ethereum closed 7% below the Thursday high and 2.5% below the open, buyers at first appeared undeterred. Some weakness and selling pressure have been observed during the New York lunch hour. Like Bitcoin, Ethereum has found buyers near the Tenkan-Sen. If bulls can hold the daily close above the Tenkan-Sen, another test of new all-time highs appears inevitable.

Advertisement

ETH/USD Daily Ichimoku Chart

However, watch for signs of selling pressure as the weekend approaches. The black vertical line represents where the nearest Kumo Twist (when Senkou Span A crosses above or below Senkou Span B) is located. Kumo Twists often mark turning points for markets that have been trending strongly at the time of the Twist. Thus, the upcoming weekend would be a perfect opportunity for short-sellers to push Ethereum price lower to test Kijun-Sen at $3,575 or Senkou Span B  at $3,350.

XRP price action frustrates bulls and bears

XRP price has spent the past two weeks trading in a very constricted trading range. The bodies of the daily candlesticks have been limited to $1.08 on the low side and $1.16 on the high side. From an Ichimoku perspective, XRP has fulfilled all conditions to confirm an Ideal Bullish Ichimoku Breakout – buy buyers need to step in and push Ripple higher. A close at or above $1.17 would likely be sufficient for XRP to begin a 50% upswing towards the $1.60 – $1.70 value area.

XRP/USD Daily Ichimoku Chart

As the weekend approaches, bulls will want to be cognizant of any strong push south which could cause a daily close below the Cloud. A close at or below $1.03 could be an early warning sign of some imminent selling pressure. If sellers were to push XRP price low enough to cause the Chikou Span to close below the candlesticks ($0.88), then a brand new bear market would likely begin for XRP.

Advertisement

News Source

Continue Reading

Ripple Vs SEC

XRP Lawsuit: Court Grants Two Motions for both parties each. Here’s how it’s a win-win for Ripple?

Published

on

ripple-v-SEC


The latest update in the XRP lawsuit explains the need for the formerly granted extension. Judge Netburn partially granted two motions, one for both parties. First, the Defendants’ Motion to Compel the SEC to produce interrogatories responses, regarding SEC’s Howey Test blanket application theory. Second, the Plaintiff’s Motion seeking a protective order under FRCP 26(c)(1), relieving the plaintiff of any obligation to respond to the 29,947 requests for admission (RFAs). Judge Netburn explains that the discovery sought in both motions overlap in certain respects, and therefore these applications are resolved together.

Court grants majority motions from the Interrogatories Dispute

Judge Netburn specified that the parties’ conflict over the application of Howey and its progeny do not render Ripple’s interrogatory improper and therefore has ordered the SEC to answer Ripple’s interrogatory No.2, identifying the specific terms of the “investment contract” from XRP sales, along with Interrogatories 11, i.e., Ripple’s move to compel the SEC to state whether it contends that “efforts by Ripple were necessary to effect any increase in the price of XRP.”

Followed by Interrogatories 1 & 11, the Court also granted Ripple Interrogatory No. 6, i.e., the defendants move to compel the SEC to state whether it contends that “Bitcoin and/or Ether are securities within the meaning of Section 2 of the 1933 Securities Exchange Act.”. Furthermore, Judge Netburn granted most of the Defendants’ motions to compel answers on other interrogatories, except Defendants’ motion regarding Larsen Interrogatory No. 5 on when XRPL was fully functional. The judge denied it without prejudice for being “too vague”.

Advertisement

SEC “irrelevance” argument discarded, while “burdensome” stance gets protection from Court

In the RFAs dispute, where the SEC sought a protective order, Judge Netburn has ordered the SEC to answer most of the RFAs while granting protection from one. Specifically, the Court has discarded SEC’s “irrelevance” argument in the case. The court Orders the SEC to produce responses for the Fourth Set requests, seeking to authenticate documents for admissibility under Rule 36(a)(1)(B) that regards the use of RFAs to establish the authenticity or genuineness of a document.

Furthermore, Judge Netburn denies SEC’s “irrelevant” contention to the Fourth Set of Requests regarding Defendants’ “fair notice” argument. The judge stated that disputes over interpretations of law are not a proper objection to a request for admission. Additionally, the court suggested the responding party either admit or deny the statement presented. The court orders the SEC to make a “reasonable inquiry” to secure such information “as are readily obtainable”, further denying the motion for a protective order to the Fourth Set of requests.

However, the court granted a protective order to the SEC for the Sixth Set of Requests regarding the disputed issue of whether Defendants’ sales of XRP constitute “investment contracts” under Howey, where the Defendants required the SEC to consider over 1,500 contracts and answer 13 preliminary questions. The Judge writes “it is hard to view this stunt as anything more than Theatre” to Defendants’ extensive 28,849 RFAs and granting protection to the plaintiff on burden grounds.

Advertisement

News Source

Continue Reading